A common practice in the world is to classify fractures as being either open or closed according to the direct tool response. This approach assumes that all conductive and low acoustic amplitude fractures are open and that all resistive and high acoustic amplitude fractures are closed or cemented. This is a big assumption to make. Even in carbonate sequences, there are many cases where the assumptions made above are not valid. There can be certain types of mineralizations that infill fractures but have a conductive or low acoustic amplitude. That is, the fracture is cemented and therefore impermeable, but still appears open according to the image response.
Clay-filled fractures are an example which can occur even in carbonates. More common are pyrites and other iron mineral fracture fillings. Slickensided surfaces may have conductive materials, and fault planes can be filled with a gouge that could appear relatively conductive in comparison to the matrix. It is an important point that the imaging tools primarily measure contrasts in the rock properties. Therefore, in a very tight rock, even a hairline or cemented fracture can appear to be relatively conductive. Bioturbation and in particular burrowing can also create what can appear to be conductive or open fractures. For all these reasons, it is advocated that fractures are primarily classified according to log response and that any inference concerning open or closed be left to the interpretation comments that form part of the well report.
Upstream Oil & Gas
$35
No Ratings & Reviews given yet..